↓ Skip to main content

Temperature measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of urinary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal methods versus pulmonary artery core method

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Temperature measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of urinary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal methods versus pulmonary artery core method
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00134-002-1619-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.-Y. Lefrant, L. Muller, J. Emmanuel de La Coussaye, M. Benbabaali, C. Lebris, N. Zeitoun, C. Mari, G. Saïssi, J. Ripart, J.-J. Eledjam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Engineering 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,585,588
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,689
of 5,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,732
of 127,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.