↓ Skip to main content

AE法を併用した静的および繰返しインデンテーション試験による高温環境下でのDLC膜の強度評価

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AE法を併用した静的および繰返しインデンテーション試験による高温環境下でのDLC膜の強度評価
Published in
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), January 2017
DOI 10.1299/transjsme.17-00213
Authors

Kensuke YOKOYAMA, Hiroaki ITO, Kojiro NISHIMIYA, Hideo CHO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,128,784
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,864
of 428,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#21
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.