| Title |
Pathology of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Ophthalmology, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10792-006-9029-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narsing A. Rao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,219,797
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#47
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,734
of 75,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.