| Title |
Ventral and sub-caudal scale counts are associated with macrohabitat use and tail specialization in viperid snakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10682-010-9432-z |
| Authors |
Paul M. Hampton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 74% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,646,064
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#182
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,651
of 99,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.