↓ Skip to main content

HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing and Behavioral Risk Reduction in Developing Countries: A Meta-analysis, 1990–2005

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing and Behavioral Risk Reduction in Developing Countries: A Meta-analysis, 1990–2005
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10461-007-9349-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Denison, Kevin R. O’Reilly, George P. Schmid, Caitlin E. Kennedy, Michael D. Sweat

Abstract

The effectiveness of HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) in reducing HIV risk behaviors in developing countries was assessed using meta-analytic methods. A standardized protocol was used for searching, acquiring, and extracting study data and meta-analyzing the results. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. VCT recipients were significantly less likely to engage in unprotected sex when compared to behaviors before receiving VCT, or as compared to participants who had not received VCT [OR 1.69; 95%CI 1.25-2.31]. VCT had no significant effect on the number of sex partners [OR 1.22; 95%CI 0.89-1.67]. While these findings provide only moderate evidence in support of VCT as an effective prevention strategy, neither do they negate the need to expand access to HIV testing and counseling services. Such expansion, however, must be accompanied by rigorous evaluation in order to test, refine and maximize the preventive benefits of learning one's HIV infection status through HIV testing and counseling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 174 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 30%
Social Sciences 41 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,389
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,051
of 160,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.