↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal assessment of body composition in healthy Swedish children from 1 week until 4 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal assessment of body composition in healthy Swedish children from 1 week until 4 years of age
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2017.125
Pubmed ID
Authors

H Henriksson, B Eriksson, E Forsum, E Flinke, P Henriksson, M Löf

Abstract

Knowledge of longitudinal body composition development is required to identify the mechanisms behind childhood overweight and obesity and to prevent these conditions. However, accurate data on this development in early childhood are lacking. Our aim was to describe the longitudinal body composition development in healthy young Swedish children. Body size and composition were assessed in 26 children using air-displacement plethysmography (1 and 12 weeks and 4.4 years of age) and isotope dilution (1.5 and 3 years of age) and compared with available reference data. Body fat (%) for boys (n=16) was 12.8±3.9 (1 week), 25.6±4.8 (12 weeks), 28.2±3.8 (1.5 years), 27.3±5.1 (3 years) and 26.1±3.5 (4.4 years). For girls (n=10) these values were 15.3±2.9, 25.7±3.9, 27.9±3.3, 26.3±7.2 and 26.0±5.3, respectively. These values were above the Fomon reference values at 1.5 years of age and later and higher than the Butte reference (P<0.05) for boys at 1.5 years of age. At all ages the coefficients of variation were higher for body fat (%) (12-30%) than for BMI (4-11%). At 4 years of age our children had more body fat than indicated by reference data. This high level may have already been established at 1.5 years of age but our small sample and the lack of appropriate reference data limit the possibility of drawing firm conclusions. Our results demonstrate the limitations of BMI when investigating overweight and obesity in early life and highlight the need for appropriate reference body composition data in infants and young children.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 23 August 2017; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2017.125.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,444,703
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,650
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,186
of 317,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#38
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.