↓ Skip to main content

この本! おすすめします 「京都高低差崖会」と「ヨーロッパ企画」に学ぶユーザの姿

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
この本! おすすめします 「京都高低差崖会」と「ヨーロッパ企画」に学ぶユーザの姿
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, September 2017
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.60.450
Authors

江上 敏哲

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,685,227
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#180
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,162
of 324,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.