↓ Skip to main content

Estimates of optimal vitamin D status

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Estimates of optimal vitamin D status
Published in
Osteoporosis International, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00198-005-1867-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bess Dawson-Hughes, Robert P. Heaney, Michael F. Holick, Paul Lips, Pierre J. Meunier, Reinhold Vieth

Abstract

Vitamin D has captured attention as an important determinant of bone health, but there is no common definition of optimal vitamin D status. Herein, we address the question: What is the optimal circulating level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] for the skeleton? The opinions of the authors on the minimum level of serum 25(OH)D that is optimal for fracture prevention varied between 50 and 80 nmol/l. However, for five of the six authors, the minimum desirable 25(OH)D concentration clusters between 70 and 80 nmol/l. The authors recognize that the average older man and woman will need intakes of at least 20 to 25 mcg (800 to 1,000 IU) per day of vitamin D(3 )to reach a serum 25(OH)D level of 75 nmol/l. Based on the available evidence, we believe that if older men and women maintain serum levels of 25(OH)D that are higher than the consensus median threshold of 75 nmol/l, they will be at lower risk of fracture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 486 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 15%
Student > Bachelor 62 13%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 9%
Other 124 25%
Unknown 95 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 7%
Chemistry 16 3%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 114 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,780,491
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#457
of 3,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,660
of 86,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.