↓ Skip to main content

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size
Published in
European Radiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00330-013-3007-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. M. Fallenberg, C. Dromain, F. Diekmann, F. Engelken, M. Krohn, J. M. Singh, B. Ingold-Heppner, K. J. Winzer, U. Bick, D. M. Renz

Abstract

To compare mammography (MG), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast cancers using postoperative histology as the gold standard.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 64 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 34%
Physics and Astronomy 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Engineering 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 78 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,428
of 4,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,801
of 201,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.