You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of feeding interventions in young children with ASD
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambulatory Child Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/cch.12157 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Marshall, R. Ware, J. Ziviani, R.J. Hill, P. Dodrill |
Abstract |
Feeding difficulties are relatively common in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but current evidence for their treatment is limited. This review systematically identifies, reviews and analyses the evidence for intervention in young children with ASD and feeding difficulties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 268 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
Researcher | 20 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Other | 50 | 18% |
Unknown | 73 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 57 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 11% |
Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,589,162
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Ambulatory Child Health
#401
of 1,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,875
of 243,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambulatory Child Health
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.