| Title |
Sexual behaviour and sexual and reproductive health education: a cross-sectional study in Romania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-11-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelia Rada |
| Abstract |
Up-to-date, genuine sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education programmes have been possible in Romania only since communism collapsed in 1990. Since 2006, Romania has had no national strategy in this field. Under current global circumstances (high labour mobility, internationally mixed marriages), issues previously considered solely national have become worldwide concerns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,619,371
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#556
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,537
of 229,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.