↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between orthographic‐motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well‐structured written text

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Educational Psychology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between orthographic‐motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well‐structured written text
Published in
British Journal of Educational Psychology, December 2010
DOI 10.1348/0007099042376373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol A Christensen

Abstract

Orthographic-motor integration refers to the way in which orthographic knowledge is integrated with fine-motor demands of handwriting. A strong relationship has shown to exist between orthographic-motor integration and students' ability to produce creative and well-structured written text (De La Paz & Graham, 1995). This relationship is thought to be due to the cognitive load resulting from lack of automaticity in orthographic-motor integration so that writers do not have sufficient resources to accomplish the more demanding aspects of writing. Interventions to improve children's orthographic-motor integration result in improved written text (Jones & Christensen, 1999).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 21%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Linguistics 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,566,954
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Educational Psychology
#91
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,254
of 192,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Educational Psychology
#15
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.