↓ Skip to main content

Dermal fibrosis in male pattern hair loss: a suggestive implication of mast cells

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Dermatological Research, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Dermal fibrosis in male pattern hair loss: a suggestive implication of mast cells
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00403-007-0826-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chong Hyun Won, Oh Sang Kwon, Yeon Kyung Kim, Yong Jung Kang, Beom Joon Kim, Chong Won Choi, Hee Chul Eun, Kwang Hyun Cho

Abstract

A relationship has been suggested between mast cells (MCs) and male pattern hair loss (MPHL), because of histological evidence of perifollicular fibrosis and increased mast cell numbers. Two paired punch biopsies were taken from balding vertexes and non-balding occipital promontory areas of ten patients with MPHL (Ludwig-Hamilton IIIv to IV) and from five normal subjects aged from 20 to 35 years. Masson trichrome and Victoria blue staining were performed to observe collagen frameworks and elastic fiber structures. Numbers of immunoreactive MCs stained with anti-tryptase or anti-chymase antibody were counted. It was found that collagen bundles were significantly increased in balding vertexes than in non-balding occiput scalp skin. A near 4-fold increase in elastic fibers was observed in both vertex and occiput scalp skins with MPHL versus controls. Total numbers of MCs (tryptase-positive) in site-matched scalp samples were about 2-fold higher in MPHL subjects than in normal controls. Percentage elastic fiber (%) was found to be relatively well-correlated with tryptase and chymase-positive MCs. These findings suggest that accumulated MCs might be responsible for increased elastic fiber synthesis in MPHL, and indicate that future investigations are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#13,916,367
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#892
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,974
of 80,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.