↓ Skip to main content

Functional divergence in gastrointestinal microbiota in physically-separated genetically identical mice

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional divergence in gastrointestinal microbiota in physically-separated genetically identical mice
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep05437
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. B. Rogers, J. Kozlowska, J. Keeble, K. Metcalfe, M. Fao, S. E. Dowd, A. J. Mason, M. A. McGuckin, K. D. Bruce

Abstract

Despite the fundamental contribution of the gut microbiota to host physiology, the extent of its variation in genetically-identical animals used in research is not known. We report significant divergence in both the composition and metabolism of gut microbiota in genetically-identical adult C57BL/6 mice housed in separate controlled units within a single commercial production facility. The reported divergence in gut microbiota has the potential to confound experimental studies using mammalian models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 36%
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,762,441
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,466
of 142,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,042
of 243,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#91
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.