↓ Skip to main content

Dogs’ comprehension of referential emotional expressions: familiar people and familiar emotions are easier

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Dogs’ comprehension of referential emotional expressions: familiar people and familiar emotions are easier
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0668-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Merola, E. Prato-Previde, M. Lazzaroni, S. Marshall-Pescini

Abstract

Dogs have been shown to discriminate between human facial expressions, and they seem to use human emotional communication to regulate their behaviour towards an external object/situation. However, it is still not clear (1) whether they just respond to the emotional message received with a corresponding increase/decrease in their level of activation or whether they perceive that the emotional message refers to a specific object, (2) which emotional message they use to modify their behaviour (i.e. whether they are following the positive message or avoiding the negative one) and (3) whether their familiarity with the informant has an effect on the dogs' behaviour. To address these issues, five groups of dogs were tested in two experiments. The first group observed the owner delivering two different emotional messages (happiness and fear) towards two identical objects hidden behind barriers, and the second group observed the owner delivering the same emotional messages but with no-objects present in the room. The third and the fourth groups observed the owner delivering a happy versus a neutral, and a negative versus a neutral emotional message towards the hidden objects. Finally, the fifth group observed a stranger acting like the owner of the first group. When the owner was acting as the informant, dogs seemed to be capable of distinguishing between a fearful and happy emotional expression and preferentially chose to investigate a box eliciting an expression of happiness rather than of fear or neutrality. Dogs, however, seemed to have greater difficulty in distinguishing between the fearful and neutral emotional messages delivered by the owner and between the happy and fearful expressions delivered by the stranger. Results suggest that dogs have learned to associate their owners' positive emotional messages to positive outcomes, and hence use their communicative messages to guide their actions. However, negative emotional messages and those delivered by strangers are not as clear to dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 33%
Psychology 41 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,177,738
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#275
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,886
of 205,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.