↓ Skip to main content

Is expanding HPV vaccination programs to include school-aged boys likely to be value-for-money: a cost-utility analysis in a country with an existing school-girl program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Is expanding HPV vaccination programs to include school-aged boys likely to be value-for-money: a cost-utility analysis in a country with an existing school-girl program
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber L Pearson, Giorgi Kvizhinadze, Nick Wilson, Megan Smith, Karen Canfell, Tony Blakely

Abstract

Similar to many developed countries, vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is provided only to girls in New Zealand and coverage is relatively low (47% in school-aged girls for dose 3). Some jurisdictions have already extended HPV vaccination to school-aged boys. Thus, exploration of the cost-utility of adding boys' vaccination is relevant. We modeled the incremental health gain and costs for extending the current girls-only program to boys, intensifying the current girls-only program to achieve 73% coverage, and extension of the intensive program to boys.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 32%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,312,870
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#658
of 8,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,510
of 233,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#14
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.