Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of laparoscopic surgical resection of transverse colon tumours
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3634-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Chand, M. R. S. Siddiqui, S. Rasheed, G. Brown, P. Tekkis, A. Parvaiz, T. Qureshi |
Abstract |
A meta-analysis of published literature comparing outcomes after laparoscopic resection (LR) with open resection (OR) for transverse colon tumours. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,940,770
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,495
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,554
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#27
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.