↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older Emergency Department attendees

Overview of attention for article published in Age & Ageing, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
169 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older Emergency Department attendees
Published in
Age & Ageing, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/ageing/afx149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn O’Sullivan, Noeleen Brady, Edmund Manning, Emma O’Shea, Síle O’Grady, Niamh O ‘Regan, Suzanne Timmons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 49 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#372,847
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#111
of 3,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,848
of 327,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.