↓ Skip to main content

Diet quality and change in anthropometric measures: 15-year longitudinal study in Australian adults

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Nutrition, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diet quality and change in anthropometric measures: 15-year longitudinal study in Australian adults
Published in
British Journal of Nutrition, August 2011
DOI 10.1017/s0007114511004351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simin Arabshahi, Jolieke C. van der Pols, Gail M. Williams, Geoffrey C. Marks, Petra H. Lahmann

Abstract

Evidence from longitudinal studies on the association between diet quality and change in anthropometric measures is scarce. We therefore investigated the relationship between a recently developed food-based dietary index and change in measured BMI and waist circumference (WC) in Australian adults (1992-2007). We used data from the Australian population-based Nambour Skin Cancer Study comprising 1231 adults aged 25-75 years at baseline (1992). We applied generalised estimating equations (GEE) to examine the association between diet quality and change in anthropometric measures. Dietary intake was assessed by an FFQ in 1992, 1996 and 2007. Diet quality was estimated using the dietary guideline index (DGI), developed to reflect the dietary guidelines for Australian adults; a higher score indicating increased compliance. Multivariable models, stratified by sex, were adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. We show that men with higher diet quality had a lower gain in BMI as compared to those with low diet quality during the 15-year follow-up. In a multivariable adjusted model, as compared to men in quartile 1 (reference), those in the highest quartile had the lowest gain in BMI (mean (95 % CI): 0.05 (0.00, 0.09) v. 0.11 (0.06, 0.16) kg/m2 per year, P =0.01). Diet quality was inversely, but non-significantly associated with change in WC. In women, DGI score was unrelated to change in any body measure. Energy underreporting did not explain the lack of association. We conclude that adherence to a high-quality diet according to Australian dietary guidelines leads to lower gain in BMI and WC in middle-aged men, but not in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#5,381
of 6,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,799
of 134,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#92
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.