Title |
High-Quality Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Tissue Acquisition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Therapy, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12325-014-0129-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bronte A. Holt, Shyam Varadarajulu, Shantel Hébert-Magee |
Abstract |
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is a multistep procedure that involves proper clinical indication, correct selection of needles, adapting evidence-based techniques such as the fanning maneuver and not routinely using suction or the stylet for tissue sampling, and establishing reliable cytopathology support. Integrating cytopathology in the training curriculum and developing a more flexible platform of needles and echoendoscopes are likely to further advance the field of endosonography. This review aims to summarize the technical issues that are key to performing high-quality endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,628
of 2,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,956
of 228,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.