↓ Skip to main content

SPROUT, HIPPO and CAESA: Tools for de novo structure generation and estimation of synthetic accessibility

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
SPROUT, HIPPO and CAESA: Tools for de novo structure generation and estimation of synthetic accessibility
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02174466
Authors

Valerie J. Gillet, Glenn Myatt, Zsolt Zsoldos, A. Peter Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Sri Lanka 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 55 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 10 16%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 23 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Computer Science 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,158,001
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#413
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,384
of 80,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.