↓ Skip to main content

Ovalbumin lipid core peptide vaccines and their CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovalbumin lipid core peptide vaccines and their CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses
Published in
Vaccine, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavla Simerska, Tittaya Suksamran, Zyta Maria Ziora, Fabian de Labastida Rivera, Christian Engwerda, Istvan Toth

Abstract

The lipid core peptide (LCP) system has successfully been used in development of peptide-based vaccines against cancer and infectious diseases (such as group A streptococcal infection). CD8(+) T cells are important targets for vaccines, however developing a vaccine that activates long-lasting immunity has proven challenging. The ability of LCP vaccines to activate antigen-specific CD8(+) and/or CD4(+) T cell responses was tested using compounds that contained two or four copies of OVA257-264 and/or OVA323-339 peptides conjugated to LCP, which are recognised by OTI (CD8(+) specific) and OTII (CD4(+) specific) T cells, respectively. The LCP-ovalbumin vaccines developed in this study were synthesised in 30% yields and showed no significant haemolytic effect on red blood cells (below 4% haemolysis when tested with compounds at up to 100μM concentrations). Promising in vivo data in mice suggested that this LCP-ovalbumin vaccine system could act as a novel and potent vehicle for the stimulation of robust antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Chemistry 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 5 22%