You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
責任の構造的間隙 : 明石市花火大会歩道橋事故をケースとして(自由論題)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society for Business Ethics Study, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.20664/jabes.19.0_179 |
| Authors |
高浦 康有 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 17% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,622,027
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Business Ethics Study
#2
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,598
of 251,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Business Ethics Study
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them