↓ Skip to main content

Managing Transplant Rejection in the Elderly: The Benefits of Less Aggressive Immunosuppressive Regimens

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Managing Transplant Rejection in the Elderly: The Benefits of Less Aggressive Immunosuppressive Regimens
Published in
Drugs & Aging, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40266-013-0082-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristian Heldal, Karsten Midtvedt

Abstract

Organ transplantation is increasingly common in the older population, particularly among end-stage renal disease patients. The outcomes of transplantation are often inferior in older people compared with younger recipients, partly because of the side effects of immunosuppressive medication used after organ transplantation. In this paper, we explore treatment considerations for older transplant patients. The current commonly used immunosuppressive protocols have not been validated sufficiently in older organ recipients. The primary objective for the management of transplant recipients of all ages is to prevent rejection without increasing the risk of infection or other long-term complications. To avoid serious side effects related to immunosuppressive treatment, the clinician should consider modifying and tailoring the long-term regimen for individual patients. Modifications for older recipients include reduction in the dosage or avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors, with or without the introduction of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and discontinuing the use of corticosteroids. Such modifications must consider the individual risks and needs of each recipient. Treatment of an acute rejection episode should follow the same protocol as for younger recipients, but special attention is needed to ensure reduction in the total immunosuppressive load. One way to achieve this is to avoid anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and to use on-demand ATG treatment of rejection on the basis of the patient's CD3 T cell count.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%