↓ Skip to main content

Cryphonectria hypovirus 1-Induced Epigenetic Changes in Infected Phytopathogenic Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Cryphonectria hypovirus 1-Induced Epigenetic Changes in Infected Phytopathogenic Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica
Published in
Microbial Ecology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-1064-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucija Nuskern, Marin Ježić, Zlatko Liber, Jelena Mlinarec, Mirna Ćurković-Perica

Abstract

Biotic stress caused by virus infections induces epigenetic changes in infected plants and animals, but this is the first report on methylation pattern changes in a fungus after mycovirus infection. As a model pathosystem for mycovirus-host interactions, we used Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1) and its host fungus Cryphonectria parasitica, in which deregulation of methylation cycle enzymes upon virus infection was observed previously. Six CHV1 strains of different subtypes were transferred into three different C. parasitica isolates in order to assess the effect of different CHV1 strains and/or subtypes on global cytosine methylation level in infected fungus, using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). Infection with CHV1 affected the methylation pattern of the C. parasitica genome; it increased the number and diversity of methylated, hemi-methylated, and total MSAP markers found in infected fungal isolates compared to virus-free controls. The increase in methylation levels correlated well with the CHV1-induced reduction of fungal growth in vitro, indicating that C. parasitica genome methylation upon CHV1 infection, rather than being the defensive mechanism of the fungus, is more likely to be the virulence determinant of the virus. Furthermore, the severity of CHV1 effect on methylation levels of infected C. parasitica isolates depended mostly on individual CHV1 strains and on the combination of host and virus genomes, rather than on the virus subtype. These novel findings broaden our knowledge about CHV1 strains which could potentially be used in human-aided biocontrol of chestnut blight, a disease caused by C. parasitica in chestnut forest ecosystems and orchards.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,478,452
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,475
of 2,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,321
of 316,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#36
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.