↓ Skip to main content

A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care—study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care—study protocol
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Ratcliffe, Emily Lancsar, Mary Luszcz, Maria Crotty, Len Gray, Jan Paterson, Ian D Cameron

Abstract

Consumer-directed care is currently being embraced within Australia and internationally as a means of promoting autonomy and choice in the delivery of health and aged care services. Despite its wide proliferation little research has been conducted to date to assess the views and preferences of older people for consumer-directed care or to assess the costs and benefits of such an approach relative to existing models of service delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 21%
Social Sciences 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#19,473
of 22,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,780
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#247
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.