You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care—study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Ratcliffe, Emily Lancsar, Mary Luszcz, Maria Crotty, Len Gray, Jan Paterson, Ian D Cameron |
Abstract |
Consumer-directed care is currently being embraced within Australia and internationally as a means of promoting autonomy and choice in the delivery of health and aged care services. Despite its wide proliferation little research has been conducted to date to assess the views and preferences of older people for consumer-directed care or to assess the costs and benefits of such an approach relative to existing models of service delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#19,473
of 22,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,780
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#247
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.