| Title |
Emerging evidence on the pathobiology of mucositis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-013-1900-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noor Al-Dasooqi, Stephen T. Sonis, Joanne M. Bowen, Emma Bateman, Nicole Blijlevens, Rachel J. Gibson, Richard M. Logan, Raj G. Nair, Andrea M. Stringer, Roger Yazbeck, Sharon Elad, Rajesh V. Lalla, For The Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#4,147
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,330
of 210,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#47
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.