↓ Skip to main content

Socio-economic Impacts on Flooding: A 4000-Year History of the Yellow River, China

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Socio-economic Impacts on Flooding: A 4000-Year History of the Yellow River, China
Published in
Ambio, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0290-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunzhen Chen, James P. M. Syvitski, Shu Gao, Irina Overeem, Albert J. Kettner

Abstract

We analyze 4000-year flood history of the lower Yellow River and the history of agricultural development in the middle river by investigating historical writings and quantitative time series data of environmental changes in the river basin. Flood dynamics are characterized by positive feedback loops, critical thresholds of natural processes, and abrupt transitions caused by socio-economic factors. Technological and organizational innovations were dominant driving forces of the flood history. The popularization of iron plows and embarkment of the lower river in the 4th century BC initiated a positive feedback loop on levee breaches. The strength of the feedback loop was enhanced by farming of coarse-sediment producing areas, steep hillslope cultivation, and a new river management paradigm, and finally pushed the flood frequency to its climax in the seventeenth century. The co-evolution of river dynamics and Chinese society is remarkable, especially farming and soil erosion in the middle river, and central authority and river management in the lower river.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Professor 11 8%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 26%
Environmental Science 21 16%
Engineering 19 14%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,095,109
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#364
of 1,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,434
of 181,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.