↓ Skip to main content

Burn Resuscitation—Hourly Urine Output Versus Alternative Endpoints

Overview of attention for article published in Shock, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Burn Resuscitation—Hourly Urine Output Versus Alternative Endpoints
Published in
Shock, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/shk.0000000000000204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer D Paratz, Kellie Stockton, Elizabeth D Paratz, Stijn Blot, Michael Muller, Jeffrey Lipman, Robert J Boots

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Shock
#1,262
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,135
of 265,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shock
#11
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.