You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Publishing trends on climate change vulnerability in the conservation literature reveal a predominant focus on direct impacts and long time‐scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12234 |
| Authors |
Sarah Chapman, Karen Mustin, Anna R. Renwick, Daniel B. Segan, David G. Hole, Richard G. Pearson, James E. M. Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 187 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 24% |
| Researcher | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 71 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,621,967
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#290
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,835
of 242,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.