↓ Skip to main content

Receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligand high-mobility group box-1 mediate allergic airway sensitization and airway inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligand high-mobility group box-1 mediate allergic airway sensitization and airway inflammation
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashik Ullah, Zhixuan Loh, Wan Jun Gan, Vivian Zhang, Huan Yang, Jian Hua Li, Yasuhiko Yamamoto, Ann Marie Schmidt, Carol L. Armour, J. Margaret Hughes, Simon Phipps, Maria B. Sukkar

Abstract

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) shares common ligands and signaling pathways with TLR4, a key mediator of house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) (HDM) sensitization. We hypothesized that RAGE and its ligand high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) cooperate with TLR4 to mediate HDM sensitization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,397,564
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2,802
of 11,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,752
of 322,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#46
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.