You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on health care utilization: A population-based controlled comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.06.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Kurdyak, Alice Newman, Zindel Segal |
| Abstract |
Elevated rates of mood and anxiety disorders among high utilizers of health care have been suggested as one driver of increased service use. We compared the impact of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), a structured group treatment, on the rates of health care utilization with matched control participants receiving non-MBCT group therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 28% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 70 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#659,947
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#62
of 3,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,000
of 243,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.