| Title |
Effectiveness and Feasibility of the Early Start Denver Model Implemented in a Group-Based Community Childcare Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-014-2168-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Vivanti, Jessica Paynter, Ed Duncan, Hannah Fothergill, Cheryl Dissanayake, Sally J. Rogers, the Victorian ASELCC Team |
| Abstract |
A recent study documented the efficacy of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) delivered in a 1:1 fashion. In the current study we investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of the ESDM in the context of a long-day care community service, with a child-staff ratio of 1:3. Outcomes of 27 preschoolers with ASD undergoing 15-25 h per week of ESDM over 12 months were compared to those of 30 peers with ASD undergoing a different intervention program delivered in a similar community long-day care service. Children in both groups made gains in cognitive, adaptive and social skills. Participants in the ESDM group showed significantly higher gains in developmental rate and receptive language. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 90 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,068,696
of 25,013,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#374
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,319
of 233,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,013,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.