↓ Skip to main content

Same players, different game: how better rules make better politics

Overview of attention for article published in Constitutional Political Economy, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 199)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Same players, different game: how better rules make better politics
Published in
Constitutional Political Economy, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10602-008-9046-4
Authors

James M. Buchanan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 41%
Other 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 41%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,591,020
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Constitutional Political Economy
#49
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,913
of 81,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Constitutional Political Economy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.