You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrient Patterns and Their Food Sources in an International Study Setting: Report from the EPIC Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0098647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurelie Moskal, Pedro T. Pisa, Pietro Ferrari, Graham Byrnes, Heinz Freisling, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Claire Cadeau, Laura Nailler, Andrea Wendt, Tilman Kühn, Heiner Boeing, Brian Buijsse, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjær, Christina C. Dahm, Stephanie E. Chiuve, Jose R. Quirós, Genevieve Buckland, Esther Molina-Montes, Pilar Amiano, José M. Huerta Castaño, Aurelio Barricarte Gurrea, Kay-Tee Khaw, Marleen A. Lentjes, Timothy J. Key, Dora Romaguera, Anne-Claire Vergnaud, Antonia Trichopoulou, Christina Bamia, Philippos Orfanos, Domenico Palli, Valeria Pala, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Maria Santucci de Magistris, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Marga C. Ocké, Joline W. J. Beulens, Ulrika Ericson, Isabel Drake, Lena M. Nilsson, Anna Winkvist, Elisabete Weiderpass, Anette Hjartåker, Elio Riboli, Nadia Slimani |
| Abstract |
Compared to food patterns, nutrient patterns have been rarely used particularly at international level. We studied, in the context of a multi-center study with heterogeneous data, the methodological challenges regarding pattern analyses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,176,882
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#104,031
of 194,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,480
of 228,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,082
of 4,366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.