↓ Skip to main content

Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals
Published in
Ambio, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M. Lewinsohn, José Luiz Attayde, Carlos Roberto Fonseca, Gislene Ganade, Leonardo Ré Jorge, Johannes Kollmann, Gerhard E. Overbeck, Paulo Inácio Prado, Valério D. Pillar, Daniela Popp, Pedro L. B. da Rocha, Wesley Rodrigues Silva, Annette Spiekermann, Wolfgang W. Weisser

Abstract

Ecological science contributes to solving a broad range of environmental problems. However, lack of ecological literacy in practice often limits application of this knowledge. In this paper, we highlight a critical but often overlooked demand on ecological literacy: to enable professionals of various careers to apply scientific knowledge when faced with environmental problems. Current university courses on ecology often fail to persuade students that ecological science provides important tools for environmental problem solving. We propose problem-based learning to improve the understanding of ecological science and its usefulness for real-world environmental issues that professionals in careers as diverse as engineering, public health, architecture, social sciences, or management will address. Courses should set clear learning objectives for cognitive skills they expect students to acquire. Thus, professionals in different fields will be enabled to improve environmental decision-making processes and to participate effectively in multidisciplinary work groups charged with tackling environmental issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 11 4%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 298 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 27 9%
Lecturer 24 8%
Professor 22 7%
Other 80 26%
Unknown 77 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 23%
Environmental Science 59 19%
Social Sciences 33 11%
Arts and Humanities 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 93 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,542,827
of 24,607,331 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#464
of 1,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,079
of 232,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,607,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.