↓ Skip to main content

Genomic variations of Oenococcus oeni strains and the potential to impact on malolactic fermentation and aroma compounds in wine

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Genomic variations of Oenococcus oeni strains and the potential to impact on malolactic fermentation and aroma compounds in wine
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3546-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eveline J. Bartowsky, Anthony R. Borneman

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is the bacterially driven decarboxylation of L-malic acid to L-lactic acid and carbon dioxide, and brings about deacidification, flavour modification and microbial stability of wine. The main objective of MLF is to decrease wine sourness by a small increase in wine pH via the metabolism of L-malic acid. Oenococcus oeni is the main lactic acid bacterium to conduct MLF in virtually all red wine and an increasing number of white and sparkling wine bases. Over the last decade, it is becoming increasingly recognized that O. oeni exhibits a diverse array of secondary metabolic activities during MLF which can modify the sensory properties of wine. These secondary activities include the metabolism of organic acids, carbohydrates, polysaccharides and amino acids, and numerous enzymes such as glycosidases, esterases and proteases, which generate volatile compounds well above their odour detection threshold. Phenotypic variation between O. oeni strains is central for producing different wine styles. Recent studies using array-based comparative genome hybridization and genome sequencing of three O. oeni strains have revealed the large genomic diversity within this species. This review will explore the links between O. oeni metabolism, genomic diversity and wine sensory attributes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Engineering 8 6%
Chemistry 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2012.
All research outputs
#19,611,252
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,478
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,170
of 126,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#52
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.