↓ Skip to main content

Investigating brain connectivity heritability in a twin study using diffusion imaging data

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating brain connectivity heritability in a twin study using diffusion imaging data
Published in
NeuroImage, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai-Kai Shen, Stephen Rose, Jurgen Fripp, Katie L McMahon, Greig I de Zubicaray, Nicholas G Martin, Paul M Thompson, Margaret J Wright, Olivier Salvado

Abstract

Heritability of brain anatomical connectivity has been studied with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mainly by modeling each voxel's diffusion pattern as a tensor (e.g., to compute fractional anisotropy), but this method cannot accurately represent the many crossing connections present in the brain. We hypothesized that different brain networks (i.e., their component fibers) might have different heritability and we investigated brain connectivity using High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) in a cohort of twins comprising 328 subjects that included 70 pairs of monozygotic and 91 pairs of dizygotic twins. Water diffusion was modeled in each voxel with a Fiber Orientation Distribution (FOD) function to study heritability for multiple fiber orientations in each voxel. Precision was estimated in a test-retest experiment on a sub-cohort of 39 subjects. This was taken into account when computing heritability of FOD peaks using an ACE model on the monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Our results confirmed the overall heritability of the major white matter tracts but also identified differences in heritability between connectivity networks. Inter-hemispheric connections tended to be more heritable than intra-hemispheric and cortico-spinal connections. The highly heritable tracts were found to connect particular cortical regions, such as medial frontal cortices, right motor cortex, and right hippocampus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 21%
Neuroscience 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,218,934
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#4,848
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,996
of 242,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#52
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.