| Title |
The role of abiotic and biotic factors in functional structure and processes of alpine subshrub communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12224-017-9296-x |
| Authors |
Estela Illa, Josep M. Ninot, Alba Anadon-Rosell, Francesc Oliva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,478,452
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#131
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,427
of 318,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.