You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Baseline cognitive functions among elderly patients with localised breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Lange, Bénédicte Giffard, Sabine Noal, Olivier Rigal, Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, Natacha Heutte, Christelle Lévy, Djelila Allouache, Chantal Rieux, Johan Le Fel, Aurélie Daireaux, Bénédicte Clarisse, Corinne Veyret, Philippe Barthélémy, Nadine Longato, Francis Eustache, Florence Joly |
| Abstract |
Cognitive deficits (CD) are reported among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, but may also be observed before treatment. Though elderly patients are expected to be more prone to present age-related CD, poor information is available regarding the impact of cancer and chemotherapy on this population. This study assessed baseline cognitive functions (before adjuvant treatment) in elderly early stage breast cancer (EBC) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,978,129
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#5,471
of 6,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,261
of 243,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#57
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.