↓ Skip to main content

因果性の学習と推論における因果ベイズネットについて

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
因果性の学習と推論における因果ベイズネットについて
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, March 2017
DOI 10.11225/jcss.24.79
Authors

斎藤 元幸

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#280
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,561
of 324,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them