| Title |
Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-014-1349-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica S. C. Morgan, Nabeel A. Shakir, Maurilio Garcia-Gil, Asim Ozayar, Jeffrey C. Gahan, Justin I. Friedlander, Claus G. Roehrborn, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu |
| Abstract |
To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using a dual versus single-console system in a resident training program using intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,716
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,469
of 227,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.