↓ Skip to main content

The Application of Laser Microdissection in Molecular Detection and Identification of Aspergillus fumigatus from Murine Model of Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Overview of attention for article published in Mycopathologia, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
The Application of Laser Microdissection in Molecular Detection and Identification of Aspergillus fumigatus from Murine Model of Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Published in
Mycopathologia, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11046-014-9777-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chong Wang, Ping Zhan, Le Wang, Rong Zeng, Yongnian Shen, Guixia Lv, Dongmei Li, Shuwen Deng, Weida Liu

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a major concern in patients with severe immune deficiency. As antifungal susceptibility varies in different fungal pathogens, accurate and timely identification of species is becoming imperative for guidance of therapy and reducing high mortality rates in patients with IA. But, in fact, the diagnosis is challenging and new validated techniques are required for the detection and identification of clinically relevant isolates. The laser capture microdissection (LCM) system enables analysis of cytologically and/or phenotypically defined cell types from heterogeneous tissue and has been used in diagnosis and fungal species identification in pulmonary aspergillosis of white storks. To establish the experimental foundation for clinical application of the system, we microdissected and collected Blankophor-stained single hyphal strands from tissue cryosections of murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) with A. fumigatus by LCM, subsequently processed for DNA extraction, PCR sequencing, and species molecular identification. The sensitivity of LCM-PCR sequencing was 89 % (89/100), and the specificity was 100 %. Moreover, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100 and 78.43 %, respectively. The result approved that the LCM-based methods had the potential for accurately diagnosis and rapidly identification fungal pathogens of IPA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Design 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#671
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,813
of 227,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.