↓ Skip to main content

Neural correlates of informational cascades: brain mechanisms of social influence on belief updating

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural correlates of informational cascades: brain mechanisms of social influence on belief updating
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.1093/scan/nsu090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael E. Huber, Vasily Klucharev, Jörg Rieskamp

Abstract

Informational cascades can occur when rationally acting individuals decide independently of their private information and follow the decisions of preceding decision makers. In the process of updating beliefs, differences in the weighting of private and publicly available social information may modulate the probability that a cascade starts in a decisive way. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined neural activity while participants updated their beliefs based on the decisions of two fictitious stock market traders and their own private information, which led to a final decision of buying one out of two stocks. Computational modeling of the behavioral data showed that a majority of participants overweighted private information. Overweighting was negatively correlated with the probability of starting an informational cascade in trials especially prone to conformity. Belief updating by private information was related to activity in the inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula, the DLPFC, and the parietal cortex; the more a participant overweighted private information, the higher the activity in the inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula and the lower in the parietal-temporal cortex. This study explores the neural correlates of overweighting of private information, which underlies the tendency to start an informational cascade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 46%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,296,295
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#805
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,870
of 242,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.