↓ Skip to main content

探索戦略の迷走

Overview of attention for article published in Akamon Management Review, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 171)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
探索戦略の迷走
Published in
Akamon Management Review, October 2017
DOI 10.14955/amr.0170512a
Authors

柴田 友厚, 馬場 靖憲, 鈴木 潤

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,388,045
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Akamon Management Review
#10
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,447
of 331,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Akamon Management Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them