↓ Skip to main content

Is rituximab effective in childhood nephrotic syndrome? Yes and no

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Is rituximab effective in childhood nephrotic syndrome? Yes and no
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00467-013-2529-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus J. Kemper, Anja Lehnhardt, Anna Zawischa, Jun Oh

Abstract

The idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (i.e. MCNS and FSGS) in children has been regarded as a disorder of T-cell function. Recent studies, however, also describe abnormalities of B-cell function. This supports the use of B-cell modulating treatment for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), especially rituximab, which has been used in other glomerular disorders as well. Many studies indicate that rituximab is effective in steroid-sensitive and -dependent nephrotic syndrome, by either inducing long-term remission or reducing relapses. In most series, children with primary (and recurrent) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) do not respond as well. The exact mechanisms of action of rituximab (as well as those of the other treatment options) in INS are as yet unclear. In addition to hosting mechanisms a direct stabilizing effect on the podocyte may also be of relevance, especially in FSGS. Although results are encouraging especially in steroid-sensitive patients, further studies on the clinical use of rituximab and the short- and long-term immunological effects and side-effects are necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,820
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#3,286
of 3,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,480
of 194,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.