↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Knee Kinematics Reflect the Articular Geometry after Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Changes in Knee Kinematics Reflect the Articular Geometry after Arthroplasty
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0440-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony M. J. Bull, Oliver Kessler, Mahbub Alam, Andrew A. Amis

Abstract

We hypothesized changes in rotations and translations after TKA with a fixed-bearing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-sacrificing but posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining design with equal-sized, circular femoral condyles would reflect the changes of articular geometry. Using 8 cadaveric knees, we compared the kinematics of normal knees and TKA in a standardized navigated position with defined loads. The quadriceps was tensed and moments and drawer forces applied during knee flexion-extension while recording the kinematics with the navigation system. TKA caused loss of the screw-home; the flexed tibia remained at the externally rotated position of normal full knee extension with considerably increased external rotation from 63 degrees to 11 degrees extension. The range of internal-external rotation was shifted externally from 30 degrees to 20 degrees extension. There was a small tibial posterior translation from 40 degrees to 90 degrees flexion. The varus-valgus alignment and laxity did not change after TKA. Thus, navigated TKA provided good coronal plane alignment but still lost some aspects of physiologic motion. The loss of tibial screw-home was related to the symmetric femoral condyles, but the posterior translation in flexion was opposite the expected change after TKA with the PCL intact and the ACL excised. Thus, the data confirmed our hypothesis for rotations but not for translations. It is not known whether the standard navigated position provides the best match to physiologic kinematics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 118 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 33%
Engineering 37 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,750
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,675
of 92,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#29
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.