| Title |
Factors influencing the surgical decision for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis in a preference-based shared decision-making process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-014-3441-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ho-Joong Kim, Jae-Young Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, Jin S. Yeom |
| Abstract |
In a preference-based shared decision-making system, several subjective and/or objective factors such as pain severity, degree of disability, and the radiological severity of canal stenosis may influence the final surgical decision for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, our understanding of the shared decision-making process and the significance of each factor remain primitive. In the present study, we aimed to investigate which factors influence the surgical decision for the treatment of LSS when using a preference-based, shared decision-making process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,200,470
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#934
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,104
of 227,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#16
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.