↓ Skip to main content

A new assay for rhamnolipid detection—important virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
A new assay for rhamnolipid detection—important virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00253-014-5904-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maisem Laabei, William D. Jamieson, Simon E. Lewis, Stephen P. Diggle, A. Tobias A. Jenkins

Abstract

Rhamnolipids (RLs) are heterogeneous glycolipid molecules that are composed of one or two L-rhamnose sugars and one or two β-hydroxy fatty acids, which can vary in their length and branch size. They are biosurfactants, predominantly produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and are important virulence factors, playing a major role in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis. Therefore, a fast, accurate and high-throughput method of detecting such molecules is of real importance. Here, we illustrate the ability to detect RL-producing P. aeruginosa strains with high sensitivity, based on an assay involving phospholipid vesicles encapsulated with a fluorescent dye. This vesicle-lysis assay is confirmed to be solely sensitive to RLs. We illustrate a half maximum concentration for vesicle lysis (EC50) of 40 μM (23.2 μg/mL) using pure commercial RLs and highlight the ability to semi-quantify RLs directly from the culture supernatant, requiring no extra extraction or processing steps or technical expertise. We show that this method is consistent with results from thin-layer chromatography detection and dry weight analysis of RLs but find that the widely used orcinol colorimetric test significantly underestimated RL quantity. Finally, we apply this methodology to compare RL production among strains isolated from either chronic or acute infections. We confirm a positive association between RL production and acute infection isolates (p = 0.0008), highlighting the role of RLs in certain infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2014.
All research outputs
#21,787,735
of 24,311,255 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#7,038
of 8,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,810
of 231,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#69
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,311,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.