You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of 153 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and functional involvement of GPC6 in osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3949 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John P Kemp, John A Morris, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Vincenzo Forgetta, Nicole M Warrington, Scott E Youlten, Jie Zheng, Celia L Gregson, Elin Grundberg, Katerina Trajanoska, John G Logan, Andrea S Pollard, Penny C Sparkes, Elena J Ghirardello, Rebecca Allen, Victoria D Leitch, Natalie C Butterfield, Davide Komla-Ebri, Anne-Tounsia Adoum, Katharine F Curry, Jacqueline K White, Fiona Kussy, Keelin M Greenlaw, Changjiang Xu, Nicholas C Harvey, Cyrus Cooper, David J Adams, Celia M T Greenwood, Matthew T Maurano, Stephen Kaptoge, Fernando Rivadeneira, Jonathan H Tobias, Peter I Croucher, Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell, J H Duncan Bassett, Graham R Williams, J Brent Richards, David M Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 47% |
| Scientists | 15 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 23% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 78 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#293,780
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#534
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,203
of 327,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.